When is enhanced due diligence required?
The cases where Cyprus law requires extra CDD, what it means for politically exposed persons, high-risk countries and correspondent banking, and the red flags that call for it.
By the ExamPass CY editorial teamLast reviewed 7 min read
Topic 9 of 14 · all topics in this chapter
- 1When CDD is required
- 2What CDD involves
- 3When CDD must be completed
- 4Verifying individuals
- 5Verifying companies and organisations
- 6Customer economic profile
- 7Beneficial ownership registers
- 8Simplified due diligence
- 9Enhanced due diligence and PEPs
- 10CDD by sector
- 11Ongoing monitoring
- 12Reliance on third parties
- 13Group-wide AML policies
- 14Prohibited practices and data use
On this page
- Short answer
- EDD cases at a glance
- What does enhanced due diligence add?
- Who is a politically exposed person?
- What must a firm do when a customer is a PEP?
- Which situations signal higher risk?
- How are high-risk countries and correspondent banks treated?
- How to think about it
- Common mistakes
- Legal references
- Practise this topic
Short answer
Enhanced due diligence (EDD) is applied on top of normal CDD whenever the risk is higher. Cyprus law names specific cases: business involving high-risk third countries, cross-border correspondent relationships involving payments, politically exposed persons (PEPs) with their family members and close associates, and transactions that are complex, unusually large or have no apparent purpose. It also requires EDD in any other situation that is high risk by nature. Typical measures are more information, senior management approval, checks on source of wealth and funds, and closer monitoring.
EDD cases at a glance
| Situation | What the firm does |
|---|---|
| High-risk third country | More information on the customer, beneficial owners and the relationship; source of funds and wealth; reasons for transactions; senior management approval; enhanced monitoring |
| Cross-border correspondent relationship involving payments | Understand the respondent's business, reputation and supervision, including any ML/TF investigation or regulatory action against it; assess its AML/CFT controls; senior management approval; documented responsibilities; for payable-through accounts, confidence in the respondent's CDD |
| PEP, family member or close associate | Senior management approval; adequate measures to establish source of wealth and source of funds; enhanced ongoing monitoring |
| PEP who has left office | Continuing risk taken into account for at least 12 months, until no PEP-specific risk remains |
| PEP as beneficiary of a life insurance policy | Checked no later than payout or assignment; if the beneficiary is a PEP, or higher risks are found, senior management is told before payout and the whole relationship is scrutinised |
| Complex or unusually large transactions, unusual patterns, or no apparent economic or lawful purpose | Examine the background and purpose as far as reasonably possible, and step up monitoring |
| EU group branch or majority-owned subsidiary in a high-risk country | EDD is not automatic if it fully follows group-wide policies; the firm takes a risk-based approach |
Source: Law 188(I)/2007, Article 64 and Annex III, as amended up to 2025.
What does enhanced due diligence add?
EDD is always added to the standard CDD measures and never replaces them. Beyond the cases the law names, a firm must apply it in any situation its risk assessment shows to be high risk, choosing measures that fit the specific risk.
Common measures fall into four groups. More information: about the identity, ownership structure, reputation and business of the customer and beneficial owner, including adverse media searches, and about the purpose of the relationship, the expected size and frequency of transactions and where funds will go. Better-quality information: for example requiring the first payment to come from an account held in the customer's own name at a bank whose CDD standards are at least as strict as the EU's, and verifying source of wealth and funds. More frequent reviews, with senior management approval to start or continue the relationship. And deeper transaction monitoring.
Source of wealth and funds can be verified from evidence such as pay slips, tax returns, public deeds, audited accounts or independent media reports. Where the risk is particularly high, that verification may be the only adequate way to manage it.
Terms used in this note
- Politically exposed person (PEP)
- Someone entrusted with a prominent public function now or in the past, together with their close family members and known close associates.
- Source of wealth
- How the customer built up their total assets, for example through inheritance, savings or the sale of a business.
- Source of funds
- Where the money in a particular relationship or transaction comes from, such as salary, including how it reached the firm.
- Senior management
- An officer or employee who knows the firm's ML/TF risk exposure well and is senior enough to take decisions affecting it; they need not sit on the board.
Who is a politically exposed person?
Under Cyprus law, a PEP is someone who holds, or has held, a prominent public function in Cyprus or any other country, together with their close family members and known close associates. The functions include heads of state and government, ministers, deputy ministers and assistant ministers; members of parliament or similar legislative bodies; members of political parties' governing bodies; judges of supreme and constitutional courts and other high-level courts whose decisions can be appealed only in exceptional circumstances; members of courts of auditors and central bank boards; ambassadors, chargés d'affaires and high-ranking officers of the armed and security forces; members of the administrative, management or supervisory bodies of state-owned enterprises; directors, deputy directors and board members of international organisations; and mayors. Middle-ranking and junior officials are not PEPs.
Close family members are the spouse or equivalent partner, the children and their spouses or partners, and the parents. Known close associates are people who jointly own a legal entity or arrangement with the PEP or have other close business ties, and people who are the sole owners of an entity set up for the PEP's benefit. The PEP measures apply to all of them.
What must a firm do when a customer is a PEP?
First, it needs risk-based systems to find out whether a customer, or a customer's beneficial owner, is a PEP. When one is, the firm obtains senior management approval before starting or continuing the relationship, takes adequate steps to establish both the source of wealth and the source of funds involved, and conducts enhanced ongoing monitoring of the relationship.
Being a PEP is not a reason to refuse business; it is a reason for extra scrutiny. When a person leaves office, the firm keeps taking the continuing risk into account for at least 12 months, and longer if the PEP-specific risk has not gone.
For life and investment-related insurance, the firm checks whether a beneficiary, or the beneficiary's beneficial owner, is a PEP no later than the payout or the assignment of the policy. If so, or if the risk is higher, senior management is informed before the payout and the whole relationship with the policyholder is examined more closely.
Which situations signal higher risk?
The law gives a non-exhaustive list of factors a firm must at least consider. Customer factors: a relationship conducted in unusual circumstances; residence in a higher-risk area; personal asset-holding vehicles; companies with nominee shareholders or bearer shares; cash-intensive businesses; ownership that looks unusual or excessively complex for the business; and customers, or their beneficial owners, applying for residence or citizenship in Cyprus in exchange for investment.
Product and channel factors: private banking; products or transactions that could favour anonymity; business done without meeting the customer, unless safeguards such as electronic identification or recognised trust services are in place; payments from unknown or unrelated third parties; new products, practices or technologies; and transactions involving oil, arms, precious metals, tobacco, cultural artefacts, ivory or protected species. Geographic factors: countries without effective AML/CFT systems, with significant corruption or crime, under sanctions or embargoes such as those of the EU or UN, or that fund or support terrorism.
How are high-risk countries and correspondent banks treated?
A high-risk third country is one the European Commission has designated for strategic weaknesses in its AML/CFT regime, or one the firm's own risk assessment rates as high risk. Business involving such a country triggers the EDD measures in the table. Branches and majority-owned subsidiaries of EU firms located there are the exception: if they fully follow group-wide policies, EDD is applied on a risk basis rather than automatically.
For correspondent relationships, the EDD package applies when a bank or financial institution enters into any cross-border correspondent relationship involving payments. Until October 2023 Cyprus law limited it to respondents outside the EEA, and older study material may still describe that version. Since June 2025, crypto-asset service providers apply similar checks to cross-border correspondent relationships with other crypto-asset businesses.
How to think about it
Name the risk, then target it. A PEP brings a corruption risk, so establish where the wealth and funds come from and get a senior decision. A high-risk country brings a jurisdiction risk, so learn more about the customer, the purpose and each transaction. A respondent bank brings its own customers' risk, so assess its controls. EDD always sits on top of normal CDD, and is a reason for closer scrutiny, not automatic refusal.
Common mistakes
Refusing every PEP. The law requires extra measures, not refusal.
Forgetting family members and close associates. The PEP measures apply to them in the same way.
Ending PEP measures the day someone leaves office. The risk is considered for at least 12 months.
Treating EDD as a substitute for CDD. It is applied in addition to the standard measures.
Assuming every country outside the EU is high risk. EDD is triggered by high-risk third countries, such as those the European Commission designates, and by the firm's own risk assessment.
Legal references
- The Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007 (Law 188(I)/2007), as amended (opens in a new tab)
Article 2 (definitions of PEP, family members and close associates) · Article 64 (enhanced due diligence) · Annex III (higher-risk factors)
- CySEC Directive for the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing, as amended (opens in a new tab)
- EBA Guidelines on ML/TF risk factors (EBA/GL/2021/02), as amended (opens in a new tab)
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 identifying high-risk third countries, as amended (opens in a new tab)
- Directive (EU) 2015/849 (4th AML Directive), as amended by Directive (EU) 2018/843 (opens in a new tab)
Articles 18 to 24
Practise this topic
Test what you just read
The Chapter 6 pack has 152 exam-style questions, 15 of them on this topic. Every question has a hint before you answer and a full explanation after.
Or revise the numbers first with 18 free Chapter 6 flashcards →