What happens at the placement stage of money laundering?
How criminal cash first gets into the financial system, how structuring and smurfing work, and the other placement techniques a compliance officer should recognise.
By the ExamPass CY editorial teamLast reviewed 5 min read
Topic 3 of 7 · all topics in this chapter
Short answer
Placement is the first stage of money laundering: criminal proceeds, usually cash, enter the financial system for the first time through a bank, a casino, a cash-based business or another legitimate channel. The best-known techniques are structuring, splitting cash into deposits small enough to avoid attention or a report, and smurfing, using many people to make many deposits into many accounts. Others include mixing cash with a business's takings, smuggling cash across borders and buying an insurance policy only to cancel it for a refund.
Placement techniques to recognise
| Technique | How it works |
|---|---|
| Structuring | One large sum is split into several deposits, each below the amount that would trigger checks or a report, spread over days or banks |
| Smurfing | Several people ('smurfs') make many deposits into many accounts at different institutions |
| Cash-intensive business | Criminal cash is added to the takings of a restaurant, café, salon or similar business |
| Cash smuggling | Physical cash is carried across a border and paid in elsewhere |
| Currency exchange and loan repayment | Criminal cash is used to buy foreign currency or to pay off a loan |
| Insurance cancellation | A policy is bought with criminal money and then cancelled; the refund arrives as a clean payment, even after a penalty |
| Reverse flip | Property is bought at a declared price well below its value and the rest is paid in cash 'under the table' |
| Loan-back | An associate receives the criminal money and lends the same amount back with loan or mortgage paperwork |
Source: FATF money laundering typologies; linked-transaction and cash rules in Law 188(I)/2007, Articles 2B and 60, as amended up to 2026.
Why is placement the riskiest moment for a launderer?
Placement is the physical disposal of criminal cash: moving it from a drawer or a suitcase into a bank account, a casino, a business that takes cash, or some other legitimate channel. Until that happens the money cannot be moved electronically, invested or spent on anything large without questions being asked.
It is also the point where the launderer has to deal face to face with an obliged entity that must identify customers, watch for unusual transactions and report suspicions to MOKAS. So placement techniques are all about looking ordinary: keeping amounts small, spreading them across people and places, or hiding the cash inside a business that normally handles cash.
Cyprus law narrows the room further. Since 31 December 2024 anyone trading in goods or providing services, including buying and selling property, may make or receive cash payments of no more than €10,000, whether in one operation or in several that appear to be linked. There are exceptions, for example payments between private individuals and cash paid in at the premises of a bank, e-money institution or payment institution, so the limit does not stop cash being deposited at a bank.
Terms used in this note
- Structuring
- Breaking a large cash amount into smaller transactions to stay below the level that would trigger checks or a report.
- Smurf
- A person used to make cash deposits on a launderer's behalf, usually one of many making small deposits into many accounts.
- Reverse flip
- A property deal recorded at a price well below the real value, with the balance paid secretly in cash.
- Cash-intensive business
- A business that normally takes a lot of cash, such as a restaurant or café, which makes extra cash hard to spot.
How do structuring and smurfing work?
Structuring splits a large amount into several smaller cash deposits, each below the level that would prompt extra checks or a report. A launderer holding €45,000 might pay in €9,000 on five different occasions: at one bank on different days, or at several banks on the same day. No single deposit stands out, but the pattern does.
Smurfing adds people. The cash is divided among several individuals, the 'smurfs', who each make many deposits into many accounts at a number of institutions. Because the depositors seem unrelated, the link between them, the deposits and the accounts is hard to see, and the money is then ready to be layered.
The law answers splitting in two ways. The CDD thresholds for occasional transactions count operations that appear to be linked, and suspicion must be reported to MOKAS whatever the amount. A pattern of deposits kept just below a threshold is itself a classic warning sign that staff should report internally.
What other placement techniques should you recognise?
Mixing is the oldest: criminal cash is added to the genuine takings of a business that naturally handles a lot of cash, such as a café, a restaurant or a hair salon, and banked as ordinary turnover. Others are carrying cash across a border to pay it in elsewhere, buying foreign currency, repaying loans with criminal cash, and setting up offshore private investment companies to receive and hold assets.
Some techniques use contracts. In the insurance route, the launderer buys a policy with criminal money, then cancels it and asks for a refund, accepting a cancellation penalty as the price of getting a clean payment from an insurer. In the reverse flip, property is bought at a declared price well below its real value and the difference is paid in cash 'under the table'. In a loan-back, the launderer gives the money to an associate, who then 'lends' the same amount back with proper-looking loan or mortgage documents.
How to think about it
Ask one question: is this the moment criminal proceeds first enter the financial system? If yes, it is placement, whatever the method. Then match the method: one person splitting amounts is structuring; many people depositing is smurfing; a business or a contract giving the cash a cover story is mixing, the insurance route, the reverse flip or a loan-back.
Common mistakes
Treating small deposits as safe because each is below a threshold. Operations that appear to be linked are counted together for CDD, suspicion is reported whatever the amount, and amounts kept just below a threshold are a warning sign in themselves.
Confusing structuring with smurfing. Structuring is about splitting the amount; smurfing is about using several people to make the deposits.
Calling luxury purchases or property investment placement. Spending or investing money that already looks clean is integration.
Thinking an insurance cancellation penalty defeats the scheme. The launderer accepts the penalty as the cost of receiving a refund that looks legitimate.
Legal references
- The Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Law of 2007 (Law 188(I)/2007), consolidated Greek text on CyLaw (amendments up to Law 25(I)/2026) (opens in a new tab)
Article 2B: €10,000 cash limit and its exceptions (inserted by Law 172(I)/2024) · Article 4: laundering offences · Article 60: CDD thresholds for single or linked transactions · Article 69: reporting suspicious transactions to MOKAS
- CySEC Directive for the Prevention and Suppression of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing, as amended (opens in a new tab)
- FATF Recommendations (opens in a new tab)
Practise this topic
Test what you just read
The Chapter 2 pack has 87 exam-style questions, 11 of them on this topic. Every question has a hint before you answer and a full explanation after.
Or revise the numbers first with 18 free Chapter 2 flashcards →