ESMA Q&A 2949: CASPs must move client funds from payment institutions by next business day
European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)Q&A ESMA_QA_2949Issued
By the ExamPass CY editorial teamPublished
- MiCA and crypto-assets
- Client assets
Short answer
In ESMA Q&A 2949, published on 16 October 2026 (answer dated 6 October), ESMA says a crypto-asset service provider (CASP) may hold clients' funds for a short time in a payment account at an e-money or payment institution, while safeguarding them under Article 70(2) of MiCA. By the end of the next business day it must place them with a credit institution or central bank, in an account in its own name or under the applicable legal asset segregation arrangement. An account in the payment provider's name does not count, even if technically segregated.
At a glance
- What changes
- ESMA confirms that a CASP may route clients' funds through an e-money or payment institution only briefly. By the end of the next business day the funds must sit with a credit institution or central bank, in an account in the CASP's own name or under the applicable legal asset segregation arrangement.
- Who is affected
- CASPs that hold clients' funds other than e-money tokens. Under Article 70(5) of MiCA these rules do not apply to CASPs that are themselves e-money institutions, payment institutions or credit institutions.
- Crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) authorised under MiCA that hold clients' funds, including Cyprus-authorised CASPs
- Finance, treasury and payments teams of CASPs
- Compliance officers and internal auditors of CASPs
- What to do
- Map how client funds flow through payment providers, check the name on every account that holds them and make sure funds reach a bank or central bank account in the firm's name, or under the applicable legal asset segregation arrangement, by the end of the next business day.
- By when
- Now — review without delay
What does ESMA's answer say?
The question, dated 28 August 2026, asked whether an authorised CASP may park clients' funds for a short time with a non-bank payment service provider, such as an e-money institution or a payment institution, and whether funds may stay longer in a bank account that the provider has opened for the CASP. ESMA answered on 6 October 2026 and published the Q&A on 16 October 2026 in its "New Q&As available" news item.
ESMA's answer covers funds the CASP receives either directly from clients or from third parties on their behalf. The CASP may hold them temporarily in a payment account with a non-bank payment service provider. During that time it must keep complying with the safeguarding duty in Article 70(2) of MiCA. No later than the end of the business day after the day the funds arrived, it must place them in an account with a credit institution or a central bank, as Article 70(3) of MiCA requires.
Why does an account in the payment provider's name not count?
ESMA says the account at the credit institution or central bank "must be opened and maintained directly in the name of the CASP or otherwise in accordance with the applicable legal asset segregation arrangement". An account held in the name of a non-bank payment service provider does not meet Article 70(3), because "the CASP would retain a claim against the payment service provider rather than being the account holder vis-à-vis the credit institution".
This is so even where the account was set up specifically for the CASP and is technically segregated from other accounts. A dedicated or segregated account held in the payment provider's name at a credit institution is therefore not enough once the next-business-day limit has passed.
What does Article 70 of MiCA require?
Article 70(2) of MiCA requires a CASP whose business model or services involve holding clients' funds other than e-money tokens to have adequate arrangements to safeguard clients' ownership rights and to prevent the use of those funds for its own account. Article 70(3) requires it to place those funds with a credit institution or a central bank by the end of the business day after receipt, in an account separately identifiable from any account holding the CASP's own funds.
Article 70(4) allows a CASP to provide payment services linked to its crypto-asset services itself or through a third party, provided whoever provides them is authorised under Directive (EU) 2015/2366. Under Article 70(5), paragraphs 2 and 3 do not apply to CASPs that are themselves e-money institutions, payment institutions or credit institutions. For background, see our study note on safeguarding client assets.
What should Cyprus CASPs do now?
The answer interprets rules that already apply, so there is no transition period. CASPs authorised in Cyprus that use e-money or payment institutions to collect or pay out client funds should map each flow and check how long funds stay with the payment provider before they reach a credit institution or central bank.
For every account that holds client funds after that point, check whose name it is in. Where the account is held by a payment provider, even as a dedicated or segregated account, arrange for the funds to move to an account opened in the CASP's own name, or under the applicable legal asset segregation arrangement, by the end of the next business day. Record the review and update safeguarding procedures and reconciliations. See also our study note on CASP organisational requirements and our study note on CASP registration and MiCA.
In the official wording
“must be opened and maintained directly in the name of the CASP or otherwise in accordance with the applicable legal asset segregation arrangement”
“the CASP would retain a claim against the payment service provider rather than being the account holder vis-à-vis the credit institution”
When does it apply?
Applies now
- CASPs holding clients' funds other than e-money tokens must have adequate arrangements to safeguard clients' ownership rights and prevent own-account use (MiCA, Article 70(2)).
- Those funds must be placed with a credit institution or central bank by the end of the business day after receipt, in an account separately identifiable from the CASP's own accounts (MiCA, Article 70(3)).
- ESMA's answer of 6 October 2026: temporary holding at an e-money or payment institution is possible, but an account in a non-bank payment provider's name does not satisfy Article 70(3).
Applies later
No later dates announced.
What to do
- Map every route by which client funds pass through an e-money or payment institution and how long they stay there.No fixed deadline
- Check that client funds reach a credit institution or central bank by the end of the business day after receipt.No fixed deadline
- Confirm that each such account is in the CASP's own name, or is held under the applicable legal asset segregation arrangement, and not in a payment provider's name.No fixed deadline
- Update safeguarding procedures, reconciliations and records to reflect the review.No fixed deadline
In the exam
MiCA authorisation and the obligations of crypto-asset service providers are covered in the crypto-asset service providers topic of the CySEC AML exam.
Related study notes
Preparing for an exam?
Practise the topics behind this update
Exam-style questions with a hint before you answer and a full explanation after, chapter by chapter.
Sources
- ESMA_QA_2949: Use by CASPs of payment accounts provided by non-bank payment service providers for holding clients' funds (MiCA, CASP) (opens in a new tab)
ESMAOfficial text
- New Q&As available (opens in a new tab)
ESMAOfficial text
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA), Article 70 (opens in a new tab)
EUR-LexOfficial text
Summary prepared by the ExamPass CY editorial team; it is not the official text. Quotations are reproduced from the source for the purpose of reporting and review.
This document has been drafted using material downloaded from ESMA's website. ESMA does not endorse this publication and in no way is liable for copyright or other intellectual property rights infringements nor for any damages caused to third parties through this publication.
© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu. EU material is reused with credit and has been summarised; only the Official Journal of the European Union is authentic.