CySEC Advanced · Chapter 3 · Topic 6 of 12

How must an investment firm identify, manage and disclose conflicts of interest?

The situations that create conflicts, the written conflicts policy and its measures, why disclosure is a last resort, and the extra rules for investment research and third-party benefits.

By the ExamPass CY editorial teamLast reviewed 7 min read

Short answer

A firm must take all appropriate steps to identify and prevent or manage conflicts between itself, its staff or tied agents and its clients, or between clients, including conflicts caused by inducements and its own pay structures. It needs a written conflicts policy, reviewed at least annually, with measures such as information barriers and separate supervision and pay. Disclosure is a last resort, used only when those measures cannot protect the client, and relying on it too much is a deficiency. Investment research needs extra safeguards, and other recommendations count as marketing communications.

Conflicts of interest at a glance

Situations to checkThe firm or a relevant person: gains or avoids a loss at the client's expense; has a distinct interest in the outcome; has an incentive to favour another client; is in the same business as the client; receives an inducement from a third party
Since 2 August 2022Conflicts that could damage a client's sustainability preferences are included
PolicyIn writing, proportionate to the firm, taking account of its group; reviewed at least annually
MeasuresInformation barriers, separate supervision, no link between the pay of people in conflicting activities, preventing undue influence and simultaneous or sequential involvement
DisclosureLast resort; on a durable medium, before acting, stating that the arrangements are insufficient and describing the conflict, the risks and the mitigating steps
Records and reportsRecord of conflicts that arose or may arise; written reports to senior management at least annually
Investment researchRecommends a strategy for distribution channels or the public, is labelled as research or presented as objective or independent, and would not be advice if given to a client; otherwise a marketing communication, clearly identified as such, stating that it was not prepared under the rules on research independence and is not subject to a ban on dealing ahead of its dissemination
Draft researchIssuers and others may not review drafts containing a recommendation or target price, except to check the firm's legal compliance

Source: Law 87(I)/2017, Articles 17(3) and 24; Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/565, Articles 33–37.

When does a conflict of interest arise?

A firm must take all appropriate steps to identify and to prevent or manage conflicts of interest between the firm, its managers, employees, tied agents or anyone linked to it by control, and its clients, or between one client and another. The duty expressly covers conflicts caused by third-party inducements and by the firm's own pay and incentive structures.

To identify conflicts that may damage a client, the firm considers at least whether it or a relevant person could profit, or escape a loss, at the client's expense; has a stake in how a service or transaction turns out that differs from the client's stake; has a financial or other reason to put another client or group of clients first; is in the same business as the client; or gets money, goods or services from someone other than the client as an inducement. Since 2 August 2022 the test also covers conflicts that could damage a client's sustainability preferences.

Terms used in this note

Conflict of interest
A situation where the interests of the firm, its staff or another client may damage the interests of a client.
Information barrier
Procedures that control the flow of information between parts of the firm whose activities could conflict.
Inducement
A fee, commission or non-monetary benefit received from, or paid to, someone other than the client in connection with a service.
Marketing communication
Promotional material; a recommendation that does not qualify as investment research is treated as one.

What must the conflicts policy contain, and when is disclosure enough?

The firm needs an effective conflicts of interest policy in writing, suited to its size and organisation and to how complex its business is, and taking account of any conflicts arising from its group. The policy identifies the situations that give rise to conflicts and the procedures and measures to manage them, such as barriers controlling the exchange of information between staff in conflicting activities, separate supervision, removing any direct link between the pay of people in one activity and the revenues of another, preventing inappropriate influence, and preventing people from being involved in several services at the same time or one after another where that impairs proper management of conflicts.

Only where these arrangements are not enough to ensure, with reasonable confidence, that clients will not be harmed does the firm disclose the conflict. Disclosure is a measure of last resort: it is made on a durable medium before acting, states that the arrangements are insufficient, and describes the conflict, the risks to the client and the steps taken to mitigate them in enough detail for an informed decision. The firm reviews the policy at least annually, and over-reliance on disclosure counts as a deficiency. It keeps a record of the services in which conflicts have arisen or may arise, and senior management receives written reports on them at least annually.

What extra rules apply to investment research and third-party benefits?

Investment research is research or other material that recommends or suggests an investment strategy for financial instruments or issuers, intended for distribution channels or the public, that is labelled or presented as investment research or as objective or independent, and that would not amount to investment advice if given to a client. A recommendation that does not meet this test is a marketing communication: it must be clearly identified as such and carry a prominent statement that it was not prepared under the rules promoting the independence of research and is not subject to any ban on dealing ahead of its dissemination.

Firms producing research must manage conflicts around it. Among other safeguards, issuers, staff other than analysts and outsiders may not review a draft that contains a recommendation or target price, other than to check that the firm complies with its legal obligations. Benefits from third parties are inducements even when no money changes hands: they are allowed only if designed to enhance the quality of the service, consistent with acting in the client's best interests and disclosed beforehand (payments that enable or are necessary for the service, such as custody costs, settlement and exchange fees, regulatory levies or legal fees, fall outside this test), and a firm giving independent advice or managing portfolios may not keep any third-party fees or monetary benefits (they must be passed on to the client in full as soon as possible) and may accept only minor non-monetary benefits, which it must clearly disclose. Cyprus still applies the 2022 rule that lets firms pay for research jointly with execution services where the issuers covered had a market capitalisation of no more than €1 billion over the 36 months before the research was provided, the firm has agreed with the research provider which part of the charges is for research, and clients are told about the joint payments; the 2024 EU Listing Act changes applicable from 6 June 2026 had not been transposed when this note was reviewed.

How to think about it

Work down a ladder. Identify conflicts with the five questions. Prevent or manage them with the measures in the written policy. Only if the risk to the client still remains, disclose, and treat that as a sign the policy may need strengthening. Review the whole thing at least once a year, and give research, which is where conflicts are most visible, its own guard rails.

Common mistakes

  1. Using disclosure as the first answer. It is a last resort, and over-reliance is a deficiency.

  2. Mixing up the five situations. Favouring another client, a distinct interest in the outcome and competing in the same business are separate tests from gaining at the client's expense.

  3. Calling any market commentary investment research. A recommendation that fails the labelling or objectivity condition is a marketing communication and needs a prominent statement.

  4. Assuming free services from third parties are harmless. Non-monetary benefits are inducements subject to the quality and disclosure tests.

Practise this topic

Test what you just read

The Chapter 3 pack has 155 exam-style questions, 13 of them on this topic. Every question has a hint before you answer and a full explanation after.

Try the free demo

Or revise the numbers first with 53 free Chapter 3 flashcards →

Last reviewed on by the ExamPass CY editorial team against the law in force on that date. Study notes help you prepare for the CySEC exams; they are not legal advice. ExamPass CY is not affiliated with CySEC.

How we write study notesReport an error